All Together Now: Tammy Baldwin and The Whole Community

by: Alexandra Cavallaro

I don’t know about you, but election night felt like a lesson in information management.

I sat with two of my friends in their living room and my wife on video chat, with three electoral maps open, my Twitter and Facebook feed constantly ticking, and Rachel Maddow on MSNBC. Silence fell only when she announced a call or prediction. I was definitely in a state of total and complete information overload and I knew it. But I couldn’t get enough. There was too much at stake and maybe, just maybe, if I kept track of thousands of pieces of data all at once, it would be okay.

And it wasn’t just the presidential race. There was Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts, Claire McCaskill in Missouri, Tammy Duckworth in Illinois, four ballot measures on marriage equality and, of course, Tammy Baldwin. As a lesbian woman, I can’t quite articulate what it means for me to see an openly gay woman elected to the Senate. We could sit here for hours and take an inventory of a long list of accomplishments for the LGBTQ community and all of them would be meaningful. But as someone who still looks around and wonders, despite these accomplishments and visibility, “where are the people like me?” as one who still has to consciously seek out representations in film and books, this feels enormous. There is a woman like me in the Senate. THE SENATE.

Hours after this momentous victory, however, a Facebook friend reminded me that Representative Baldwin withdrew a transgender-inclusive ENDA. As a result, she has been criticized as trans-phobic and hailed as a savvy politician. She has been characterized as throwing trans people under the bus and making a smart political move. Based on her speech, I want to—no, need to—believe the latter. She says, in her House speech, “…we should be acting on an inclusive ENDA, covering both sexual orientation and gender identity… People have asked why I pressed for and insisted upon bringing an amendment to the floor and maintaining the option to withdraw it without a vote. The reason is simple: I believe that those who will be left behind by this bill deserve to hear, on this House floor, that you are not forgotten. And our job will not be finished until you, too, share fully in the American Dream. So at the moment at which the closing arguments are made, I will withdraw this amendment, with a commitment to my colleagues and all American committed to equality of opportunity and ending discrimination, that I will do everything within my power to make this measure whole again.”

This image of wholeness and her words, “you will not be forgotten” remind me on this momentous occasion where the work needs to happen. That a politician withdrew a bill because it wouldn’t pass with protections for gender identity means that we still have a long way to go. We must continue to fight for the visibility and protection of the trans members of our community. We cannot continue to allow their exclusion, marginalization and invisibility. We must not forget them in the push forward, because doing so has fractured us in the past and will continue to fracture us in the future. In these next four years, let’s continue to move forward and to amass more victories: more visibility, more legal protection, more marriage equality. But let’s do it with all of us, with the wholeness of our community. Until that time, our job will not be finished.

Let’s take a moment to celebrate this victory. And then let’s get back to work.

Alexandra Cavallaro is a reader, a writer, a baker, and a knitter of many socks. She has way more books than she has clothes, so prepare to see this outfit again. She loves thinking about food politics, queer issues, and the miracle that is language.
Currently, she’s working on her PhD in Writing Studies/Rhetoric, but in her free time she enjoys being a bleeding heart liberal feminist killjoy. And knitting many socks.

About these ads

3 responses on “All Together Now: Tammy Baldwin and The Whole Community

  1. “She has been characterized as throwing trans people under the bus”

    This is an internet urban legend and although you say it’s not your preferred interpretation, frankly I’m kinda pissed that you’re giving the idea enough credence to even treat it as one of two possibilities. It’s *not* one of two possible interpretations of events. It’s just plain false.

    http://freedominwickedness.tumblr.com/post/35193750858/on-tammy-baldwin-and-enda

    Here’s what happened: (1) Barney Frank introduces trans-inclusive ENDA. (2) Barney Frank apparently can’t get enough of his colleagues to agree to it to pass, but still wants to pass something that session. So he pulls his bill and introduces a new bill, which strikes trans inclusion. (3) Baldwin revolts. She refuses to endorse the new SPLENDA bill and introduces an amendment to put trans inclusion back in the bill. (4) But, as a House member, you can’t just hold a vote on a bill. Almost nothing happens in the House without the consent of the majority party leadership. They decide which bills and amendments get debated, which ones get voted on, and what just remains a useless piece of paper filed with the Library of Congress. House leadership generally doesn’t like bringing up votes unless they know they’re going to pass, though, at least not on legislation they fundamentally support. And since it was known (leadership “whips” its members, so they do know how votes will go without actually holding them) that trans inclusion wouldn’t pass at the time– otherwise Frank would have just gone with the inclusive bill in the first place– they’re just not going to let that amendment come up for a vote. (5) So Baldwin is allowed to take her amendment to debate, but not allowed to let it be voted on. They do a weird little parliamentary hack. She comes in, introduces her amendment on the House floor, is allowed her five minutes to make a case for it, and seven minutes after introducing it pulls it again. But if she hadn’t agreed to pull the amendment at the end of her five minutes, it wouldn’t have been debated at all.

    In other words, what Baldwin is being attacked for is *trying to force trans rights back INTO enda*! If she had just sat quietly and done nothing– let Frank strip trans inclusion from ENDA, not tried to push back– there’d be nothing to attack her for right now. If she had submitted her amendment but rejected a deal to let it be debated and then pull it– in other words, forfeited her one chance to put an objection to SPLENDA on the Congressional record– there’d be nothing to attack her for right now. She’s being smeared for the opposite of what she actually did, and treating this as a story with two sides just furthers a situation where she’s being *punished* for trying to help us by creating a cloud of uncertainty and innuendo around her.

  2. Tammy Baldwin was completely an ally of the trans community in a way that Barney Frank and the HRC weren’t and openly critiqued both of them for their hypocrisy. Rep. Baldwin said she would not support ENDA without trans inclusion. This essay is a prime example of how social networking can spread untruths and when it’s done by allies they need to really study trans history and not just take the word of someone on Facebook.

  3. The fact that we are having a debate about this issue is itself fabulous and shows we have made progress. But yes, we have farther to go.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s